NEEDS · Equipment Supplier
• Pre-assembly tolerance management per individual component (traditional method)
• Post-assembly error management — cannot fully represent complex structures
• No chamber-to-chamber assembly tolerance management (cannot evaluate chamber-level quality equivalence)
• Harder to establish management criteria as chamber structures become more complex
NEEDS · Mass Production Fab.
• No way to verify identical reassembly state during equipment setup
• No way to confirm identical recovery state before/after PM
• Limited ability to observe long-term drift of specific parts during PM cycle
SOLUTION · IRIS Sensor
• Measures spectral data representing chamber assembly state
• Expresses assembly tolerance via similarity index → enables evaluation of installation and recovery state at the chamber level
• Analyzes long-term change by spectral band → enables real-time long-term change evaluation of specific parts during operation
• Expresses identity qualitatively and quantitatively via spectrum comparison
Monitoring (FDC)
- Tracks long-term change of contamination during PM cycle
- Tracks long-term change of consumable parts during PM cycle
- Verifies repeatability of process gap
- Verifies repeatability of per-wafer process
- Verifies wafer-less sub-process repeatability (base check, burn-in check)
- Verifies chamber state before/after remote plasma cleaning
Diagnostics
- Real-time measurement of process gap (scaled gap)
- Real-time measurement of TES height (scaled height)
- Measurement of stabilization time after PM
- Measurement of recovery rate after PM
- Provides Tool to Tool Matching comparison data
Prediction
- Predicts maintenance timing
Chip Manufacturing Fab.
• Improves productivity and reduces maintenance costs by tracking long-term changes
• Component-level management tool via chamber physical state diagnostics
• Tool to Tool Matching evaluation across PM cycles, Process Modules, and Systems
Equipment Supplier
• Verification of Tool to Tool Matching before and after equipment delivery
• Component-level improvement and development tool for mass production environments
- Scans 3–14 GHz frequency band
- Records S₁₁ (reflectance) signal
- Stores spectral data periodically (~2 sec intervals)
- Active measurement — measures during non-process periods (~1mW)
- Structural changes reflected as resonance peak changes in spectrum
- Treats each S₁₁ spectrum as a state data unit
- Defines initial state data
- Calculates similarity between initial and current state data
- Observes time-series data of similarity
- Observes similarity changes in response bands linked to specific components
- Classifies synchronized state data as needed
- Observes long-term changes (PM cycle unit analysis)
- Observes short-term changes (wafer to wafer, Lot to Lot)
The 3D chamber interior spectrum expresses complex resonance characteristics as components interlink and change
→ This is why specialized analysis algorithms and programs are required
Comparison: OES handles 1D optical resonance spectra at the atomic/molecular level → Peak interpretation is intuitive
▪ Scans frequency while measuring the chamber's reflectance spectrum
▪ S₁₁ (reflectance) is the ratio of reflected power to incident forward power
▪ Injects wavelengths (= frequencies) at the scale of the internal chamber structures
𝑆11=10 log10 PrΤPf Pr : Reflected Power, Pf : Forward power
Similarity
A metric for evaluating the degree of identity between different state data
Baseline data
• Initial state data for calculating long-term and short-term time-series similarity
• e.g.) Stabilized state data after PM
• e.g.) Stabilized idle state data from one of PM1, PM2, PM3
Current data
• Current state data
• fingerprint of current chamber state
• e.g.) Idle state, run state, or state data observed during PM
Similarity Time-Series Graph vs. Time Axis (blue line)
• Time-series data summarizing chamber state into a single similarity value
• Calculated using full or partial frequency range state data as needed
Sync.
• Points with identical chamber H/W state
• e.g.) Chuck Home Position
Response band
• Frequency range reflecting changes of a specific component (parts, process variables)
Reference data (Library)
• State data for a specific variable combination
• e.g.) State data at Home position, process position
• e.g.) State data at a specific step of the process recipe
🔶 BASIC : Synced monitoring
(stand-by state: median)
🔶 BASIC : Synced monitoring
(stand-by state: range)
🔶 BASIC : Long-term prediction
(To PM point: stand-by state trend)
🔶 CUSTOMIZED : Synced diagnostics
(TES height: response band)
Sensor Unit
Components
Functions
Specifications
Control Console
Components
Functions
Specifications
Measurement Software
License
Functions
Specifications
Analysis Software
Auto Analysis (for Mass Production Fab.)
Manual Analysis (for Research)
INSTALLATION ENVIRONMENT (RECOMMENDED)
• Metal-shielded structure forming an enclosed space
• Chamber equipped with a viewport that allows electromagnetic waves to pass through
• Chamber where mesh, holes, slits, etc. do not excessively interfere with electromagnetic wave transmission
• Build sub-recipe observation functions for equipment stability management (base pressure check, auto burn-in check, etc.)
• Perform solution optimization as mini-projects for other customer pain points
A: Similarity difference values between long-term baseline data (example)
- Uses baseline data calculated after each PM as the representative value for the PM cycle
- When the reference point is changed, relative difference values with the remaining points are displayed
- Can quantitatively verify how much the recovered chamber state differs per PM cycle
B: Operating rate, stabilization time, recovery rate history